Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:34:38 -0400
From:      Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr>
Cc:        trhodes@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, pgj@FreeBSD.org, daichi@FreeBSD.org, simon@FreeBSD.org, scrappy@hub.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, keramida@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org, manolis@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Add a VirtualBox section to Handbook's 'Virtualization' chapter
Message-ID:  <20090719113438.07c05110.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A62D333.9090203@otenet.gr>
References:  <4A5C5F13.7030607@FreeBSD.org> <4A5D5ED7.5000101@freebsd.org> <20090717215636.GA1141@arthur.nitro.dk> <4A61733D.9010702@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0907181436540.90690@hub.org> <4A62D333.9090203@otenet.gr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:02:59 +0300
Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> >
> >> But isn't qemu distinctly different in the way it works from a
> >> virtualization program like VMWare or VirtualBox? I think the first
> >> paragraph serves well as a gentle introduction to the topic.
> >
> > How different?  Wine, I could see, but qemu?  Please elaborate ...
> >
> 
> AFAIK qemu also provides processor emulation, thus is mostly referred to
> as an emulator rather than a virtual machine. I am no expert on this
> though - I've used qemu in the past but could never get the level of
> performance possible with VirtualBox or VMWare (which beats them both I
> believe).
> 
> The paragraph was loosely based on the original one stating "No
> virtualization solution for FreeBSD as a host". Seems the original
> author also did not consider qemu as a virtual machine in this sense.
> 

Interesting - see, I tried doing an install of qemu a long
while ago but never went beyond installing it.  Though, from
what I have read, I would not consider it a "virtual machine
host solution" either.  While I understand it runs image files,
I don't think it's geared for several OS images, running
concurrently.  Again, note, I only installed - and when the
image I had (passed by a friend) failed to run, I just removed
it.

In the end, my virtualization solution has been VMWare ESXi,
and VirtualBox only on a Linux host.  So, I reserve the right
to be wrong.  :P


-- 
Tom Rhodes



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090719113438.07c05110.trhodes>