Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:53:27 +0200 (SAT)
From:      John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za>
To:        asmodai@wxs.nl (Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai)
Cc:        nectar@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind FREEBSD-Xlist
Message-ID:  <200202080853.g188rRO39489@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <20020208065440.GB52378@daemon.ninth-circle.org> from Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai at "Feb 8, 2002 07:54:41 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -On [20020206 16:45], John Hay (jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za) wrote:
> >Well like I tried to imply in my previous email, you can look at
> >"upgrading to v9.x" as a feature enhancement or measured against the
> >history of v8 as preventative security fixes. :-) 
> 
> That argument does not hold much ground.
> 
> When I discussed BIND 9 with Kris Kennaway a bunch of months ago he
> decided to look at the code a bit.  A day later the BIND folks had a
> patchset to fix a lot of security problems noted by one auditor.

So are they then selective of what they put on their security page?

http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security.html

Or are we just lucky that the dark side haven't turned their efforts
to v9 servers yet?

John
-- 
John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202080853.g188rRO39489>