Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:23:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <lists@wm-access.no> To: OxY <oxy@field.hu> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: packet drop with intel gigabit / marwell gigabit Message-ID: <442598C6.8000802@wm-access.no> In-Reply-To: <008501c65030$96726710$0201a8c0@oxy> References: <20060322071023.70808.qmail@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <442187FE.3060300@lbl.gov> <003301c64f44$89fdcd40$0201a8c0@oxy> <820F5FD6-C31F-4C28-9E66-64643C03086B@foolishgames.com> <4424520D.9000504@lbl.gov> <008501c65030$96726710$0201a8c0@oxy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0B5CF7AB7030B604F0588AE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OxY wrote: > what kind of details should i attach? to analyze the problem? >=20 Host and peer packet statistics, cabling specs. What measures have you taken to exclude cable, peer or duplex mismatch=20 problems? --=20 Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal --------------enig0B5CF7AB7030B604F0588AE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEJZjNMvOF8Nb1apsRAsrVAJ9RjTdSYUfuLeOvX3PCzz11XIB65ACbB8OR jTgtjO8TTFH18BZX/NNXlrY= =61yK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0B5CF7AB7030B604F0588AE6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?442598C6.8000802>