Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 17:58:08 -0700
From:      "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To:        "Tani Hosokawa" <unknown@riverstyx.net>, "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>, <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1@youwant.to>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141739150.689-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

> Any time I've ever heard of this particular point being raised it was to
> boost FreeBSD, since it's easier to develop for a single platform.  For
> example, the NTP people dropped official support of Linux because of the
> frequency of changes to the kernel, as well as the difficulty in making it
> work on all flavours of Linux.  They mentioned FreeBSD specifically as a
> more stable platform developer-wise.

	Amusing, considering that the latest versions of NTP run fine on Linux and
break on FreeBSD.

	DS



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1>