From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Oct 16 06:56:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5B215D1D5; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46tNPs2jySz4Kqk; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E633E45; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 02:56:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (ip-109-42-0-155.web.vodafone.de [109.42.0.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CD9333E42; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 02:56:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:56:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Rodrigo Osorio cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r514406 - in head/security: . libscep libscep/files p5-Crypt-LibSCEP In-Reply-To: <201910131602.x9DG21iY069347@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201910131602.x9DG21iY069347@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46tNPs2jySz4Kqk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gerald@pfeifer.com designates 209.68.5.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gerald@pfeifer.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:hamza.pair.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[pfeifer.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-2.18)[ip: (-7.71), ipnet: 209.68.0.0/18(-2.00), asn: 7859(-1.14), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[143.5.68.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[155.0.42.109.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7859, ipnet:209.68.0.0/18, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:56:51 -0000 On Sun, 13 Oct 2019, Rodrigo Osorio wrote: > Author: rodrigo > Date: Sun Oct 13 16:02:00 2019 > New Revision: 514406 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/514406 > Added: head/security/libscep/Makefile > ============================================================================== > +USE_GCC= yes This... > Added: head/security/p5-Crypt-LibSCEP/Makefile > ============================================================================== > +USE_GCC= yes ...and this make me a little uneasy. Why does a new port / current software require GCC? Does it really not work with clang? (That may be worth a comment in the Makefiles.) Gerald