From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  5 16:32:42 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87D7106566B;
	Tue,  5 Apr 2011 16:32:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from proxypop2b.sarenet.es (proxypop2.sarenet.es [194.30.0.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F598FC16;
	Tue,  5 Apr 2011 16:32:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.1.55] (ssglan.sare.net [192.148.167.100])
	by proxypop2b.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C1873611;
	Tue,  5 Apr 2011 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <4D9B4041.4010206@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:32:40 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A92B35B-FC1F-4988-A2D9-AC79ABC63B07@sarenet.es>
References: <4D9AF9B7.9030107@FreeBSD.org>
	<D10B0D62-E11E-445C-B9FA-DB4276F678B0@sarenet.es>
	<4D9B0DF7.8020104@FreeBSD.org> <4D9B4041.4010206@FreeBSD.org>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: propose: change some sense codes handling
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:42 -0000


On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:

>> Interesting.  Thank you for sharing this information!
>> Let me think about it :)
>=20
> OK.  I completely agree with you here.
> I think that this sense code should be handled by peripheral drivers =
where it
> makes sense.  E.g. da(4) could simply retry a command while at probing =
stage (i.e.
> there was no previous media detected), otherwise "spoil" its previous =
disk and
> probe a new disk.
> Thanks for straightening me :)

Really glad to be of any help!=20



Cheers,





Borja.