From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 29 19:13:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C0B16A4DD for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=38983aa42@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5640B43D49 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=38983aa42@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2006 12:13:55 -0700 Message-ID: <44F491F3.8000200@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:13:55 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Regnauld References: <44EF6E18.6090905@elischer.org> <44F3429F.6050204@FreeBSD.org> <44F344FA.1000408@elischer.org> <20060828195339.GF37035@funkthat.com> <44F362C0.6080309@elischer.org> <44F37063.6010302@elischer.org> <20060828182947.p8ylw4x48oko00kg@mail.bafirst.com> <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20060829075727.GD20989@catpipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:13:55 -0000 Phil Regnauld wrote: >eculp@bafirst.com (eculp) writes: > > >>I assume that you have seen the following: >> >>http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views >> >> > > That is definitely the right way to do it imho. > > unless as I said, I cannot run another nameserver on this box.. (there is already one running here) and even if I could I couldn't distiguish which sessions should get which views. > > >>I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try >>especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and >>ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family. >> >> > > djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC. > > Phil > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >