From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jan 11 12: 1:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35E737B405; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0BK1L281185; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:01:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:01:21 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Clarke To: Alan Eldridge Cc: dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: CUPS support can be unconditional [signing off of this one] In-Reply-To: <20020111195742.GA45830@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Message-ID: <20020111145901.C80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Alan Eldridge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:45:23PM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: > > >I think it makes things even more confusing since CUPS printing will not > >work with just cups-base. And, when you compile with CUPS printing, Samba > >tries to enable it by default. Therefore, without cups-lpr, printing will > >be broken in CUPS by default if you just include cups-base...and do so > >unconditionally. > > Does anybody start Samba and just expect it to work with no > configuration? > > If you can print, by default, via samba and regular lpr, without ever > once running SWAT or editing smb.conf, then you've got a point, And a > very insecure samba installation by default. SWAT was the one that configured CUPS for me automatically. As soon as I installed Samba with CUPS, I went into SWAT, and _it_ added the printing entries to smb.conf for me. I guess had I gone into advanced I could have saud, "whoa! I have to do BSD printing." > > We'll just have to disagree on this. It's dwcjr@'s call. Samba and > kdelibs are the only ports that have the cups issue. I'm not likely to > budge from my position, and I doubt I can sway you from yours. Yep. But you already have one proponent it seems. I'll compromise on the PACKAGE_BUILDING, otherwise we'll have to agree to disagree :-). Joe > > -- > Alan Eldridge > Pmmfmffmmfmp mmmpppppffmpmfpmpppff PmpMpmMpp ppfppp MpfpffmppmppMmpFmmMpm > mfpmmmmmfpmpmpppff. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message