From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 08:17:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9692C16A4CE; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6318243D31; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:17:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 1929A5309; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:17:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 8EEBB5308; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:16:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0EFE533C6F; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:16:55 +0100 (CET) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200402192212.i1JMCUxx092480@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040219222006.GA19860@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040220012254.GB4306@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040220153933.GA29018@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:16:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040220153933.GA29018@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:39:33 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: Gerald Pfeifer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:17:04 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > I am, but I've never demanded that FreeBSD's use of "i386" and "ia32" be > changed. AMD has affected the modern 32-bit x86 architecture as much as > Intel has. AMD paid all the millions and millions for the ISV & IHV > support. W/o AMD going to market with this design there would be no > "ia32e" from Intel. Intel had no choice and was totally forced by the > market to do their "ia32e". We owe honoring AMD by calling the platform > "amd64". I think it's only fair. Intel created the i386 and AMD copied it; we still call it the i386. AMD created the amd64 and Intel copied it; we should still call it the amd64. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no