Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:08:39 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>, marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383538 - head/databases/sqlitemanager Message-ID: <55245567.40702@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <55244DFC.4050609@aldan.algebra.com> References: <201504072014.t37KEtvQ028188@svn.freebsd.org> <55243D74.7060009@marino.st> <55244200.9060002@FreeBSD.org> <55244A00.6010702@marino.st> <55244DFC.4050609@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/7/2015 23:37, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 07.04.2015 17:20, John Marino wrote: > Yes, I do think it is better to save a port imperfectly, than to let it > expire for a silly reason. The port is now better, than it was. If it > can be improved further, you are welcome to it. It's not like anybody was complaining about it's deprecation. Honestly I'd rather see a port die before seeing it fixed in a half-assed fashion, especially if you aren't going to stand behind your work. >> (there it was said *NEVER* use CP to install files, so obviously what >> you did is not fine.) > I don't know, John, what your expectations are of the fellow > ports-maintainers, but I'm not going to review archives of mailing lists > every time I do a commit. If portlint and other automated checks I'm > aware of are happy, then so am I. Part of the discussion is that this particular error may be added to portlint, but portlint is just a tool. You are still responsible for following the PHB regardless of what portlint says or doesn't say. All the commits are peer-reviewed, so its seems that it's everyone's expectations that mistakes during the review are fixed and hopefully those are a one time thing. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55245567.40702>