Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:11:31 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail
Message-ID:  <4AA6F2B3.8000909@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net>
References:  <ff6efe7e0909011230i414b6791k707f5c58383e9b53@mail.gmail.com>	<20090902160440.GA28417@sd-13813.dedibox.fr>	<4A9E98AD.1070202@FreeBSD.org> <200909030808.08440.jhb@freebsd.org>	<4AA6A22B.1070402@FreeBSD.org> <20090908234719.GC418@sysmon.tcworks.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Lambert wrote:

> Some of us are just using a jail per service to make the service more
> portable between these massively overpowered machines these days. 

Yes, that makes total sense. I'm not saying that running it in a jail
is a _bad_ thing, just that perhaps it is overkill.


Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AA6F2B3.8000909>