Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:35:31 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, josb@cncdsl.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND
Message-ID:  <20010219103531.N6641@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <200102191825.f1JIPde37350@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:25:39AM -0800
References:  <200102191012.DAA17412@usr05.primenet.com> <200102191825.f1JIPde37350@earth.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> [010219 10:26] wrote:
> :When I brought up the issue of the old Soft Updates license being
> :a problem for Best Internet, I wasn't joking: technically, they
> :were using Soft Updates legally, but sale of their business when
> :they were acquired could have triggered the license clause which
> :prohibited FreeBSD from being shipped with the code compiled into
> :the kernel and enabled by default.
> 
>     Huh?  It was a while ago but I am fairly certain I sent a Kirk a
>     check for our use of softupdates at BEST.  I understand your point,
>     though, but it's a rather severe interpretation and I don't think 
>     it applies to either softupdates or DJBDNS.

I think Terry is tossing the idea around that it would or couldn't be
possible for a company aquisition to transfer all software licenses.

If this is how it works, suddenly whomever bought Best got to use
softupdates in a much larger setup than Kirk probably initially
thought.  Sort of like Foocom Inc buying a license to ship several
hundred units a year at a bargain price then having Sun swallow
them and take advantage of the license.

If this isn't how it works, then whomever bought Best might have
been in for a lot of trouble depending on how much Best itself
relied on softupdates to function.  If the license was non-transferable
even through aquisition then it might render a lot of Best's
technology useless.

All this is speculation, I'm sure Best liked softupdates, but could
have managed without them. :)

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010219103531.N6641>