From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 8 10:22:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA27542 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 10:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gbdata.com ([207.90.222.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA27514; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 10:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gclarkii@localhost) by main.gbdata.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id MAA01667; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:20:31 -0600 (CST) From: Gary Clark II Message-Id: <199611081820.MAA01667@main.gbdata.com> Subject: Re: Need "a" ghostscript To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:20:30 -0600 (CST) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, se@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from Andreas Klemm at "Nov 7, 96 09:35:05 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andreas Klemm wrote: > > I think we could remove ghostscript 2.6.2 and 3.x port. gs4 seems > pretty stable. No need to keep several versions like with tcl/tk. I'm concerned with the license on gs4. I belive it is more restrictive than the ones on 2 & 3. > > Does somebody have something against removal of gs2 and gs3 port ?! > > Andreas /// > Gary -- Gary Clark II (N5VMF) | I speak only for myself and "maybe" my company gclarkii@GBData.COM | Member of the FreeBSD Doc Team Providing Internet and ISP startups mail info@GBData.COM for information FreeBSD FAQ at ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.ORG/pub/FreeBSD/docs/freebsd-faq.ascii