Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:01:26 -0800
From:      Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>
To:        eculp <eculp@encontacto.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Do SpamAssassin spamd and Obspamd  play nicely together?
Message-ID:  <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net>
References:  <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:13:16PM -0600, eculp wrote:
> I have sa-spamd running and I just installed obspamd or pfspamd what ever 
> it should be called and the spamd log file seems taken over by spamasassin. 
>  Are there any other conflicts or changes that should be made to use both.

Funny, since I indirectly touched on this problem many moons ago when
writing a document on issues we encountered when attempting to migrate
from postgrey to OpenBSD spamd.  See section "Issues with OpenBSD spamd
on FreeBSD":

http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                    jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                           http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                      Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.                  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080204220126.GA25963>