From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  4 22:01:26 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D508016A419
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Feb 2008 22:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jdc@parodius.com)
Received: from mx01.sc1.parodius.com (mx01.sc1.parodius.com [72.20.106.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C824C13C458
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Feb 2008 22:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jdc@parodius.com)
Received: by mx01.sc1.parodius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BBD121CC038; Mon,  4 Feb 2008 14:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:01:26 -0800
From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>
To: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net>
Message-ID: <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
References: <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Do SpamAssassin spamd and Obspamd  play nicely together?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:01:26 -0000

On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:13:16PM -0600, eculp wrote:
> I have sa-spamd running and I just installed obspamd or pfspamd what ever 
> it should be called and the spamd log file seems taken over by spamasassin. 
>  Are there any other conflicts or changes that should be made to use both.

Funny, since I indirectly touched on this problem many moons ago when
writing a document on issues we encountered when attempting to migrate
from postgrey to OpenBSD spamd.  See section "Issues with OpenBSD spamd
on FreeBSD":

http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                    jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                           http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                      Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.                  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |