From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 14 20: 7:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from avarice.riverstyx.net (hq-port-97.harbour-dhcp-pool.infinetgroup.com [207.23.37.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08A814FE6 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:07:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from unknown@riverstyx.net) Received: from avarice (unknown@avarice [207.23.37.97]) by avarice.riverstyx.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA02810; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:07:33 -0700 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:07:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Tani Hosokawa To: David Schwartz Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? In-Reply-To: <000001bece6f$03c2c3a0$021d85d1@youwant.to> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > > The current model is a hybrid thread/process model, with a number of > > processes each with a large number of threads in each, each thread > > processing one request. From what I've seen, 64 threads/process is about > > right. So, in one Apache daemon, you can expect to see >1000 threads, > > running inside 10-20 processes. Does that count as a large number? > Yes. And it's bad design. I'm curious. How would you do it? --- tani hosokawa river styx internet To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message