From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 20:41:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57798F6; Mon, 26 May 2014 20:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9892429BD; Mon, 26 May 2014 20:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCE543B4A; Mon, 26 May 2014 15:41:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5383A6CA.9090004@marino.st> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 22:40:42 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUnV0a293c2tp?= , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/189666: devel/py-demjson: unfetchable due to rerolled tarball References: <201405260846.s4Q8kUdC079970@freefall.freebsd.org> <53839C13.4040405@marino.st> <5383A1B3.9070501@marino.st> <320E544D-4247-48D0-B3A6-E2471B36ED7D@robakdesign.com> <03A1FF33-BC5E-40B4-9742-575C9B38D439@robakdesign.com> In-Reply-To: <03A1FF33-BC5E-40B4-9742-575C9B38D439@robakdesign.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@robakdesign.com, freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 20:41:19 -0000 On 5/26/2014 22:31, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: > > Wiadomość napisana przez Bartłomiej Rutkowski w dniu 26 maj 2014, o godz. 22:23: > >> >> Wiadomość napisana przez John Marino w dniu 26 maj 2014, o godz. 22:18: >> >>> On 5/26/2014 22:12, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: >>>> SHA256 (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) = 24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d >>>> SIZE (demjson-2.0.tar.gz) = 115914 >>>> >>>> what perfectly matches what the author says it should be. I've asked him if he can check his release system and distfiles providers to see if he can spot any changes and if he can by any chance match our sum/size that's incorrect to anything around there. >>>> >>>> Any chance you or anyone else have the 'bad' distfiles available on their system for inspection? >>> >>> I have the original 2.0 (One of the ones upstream says never existed): >>> http://muscles.dragonflybsd.org/misc/demjson-2.0.tar.gz >>> 189103 May 26 13:15 demjson-2.0.tar.gz >>> >>> So 2.0 built once, but then the distfile changed not once but twice and >>> the 115k version is the at least the 3rd iteration. I never got the >>> intermediate iteration. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >>> >> >> Thanks - I've passed that to the author and I am waiting for his thoughts on what's happening here. I'll inspect the distfile on my own as soon as possible, most probably tomorrow - I'll update you if I find anything. >> >> Kind regards, >> Bartek Rutkowski > > John, would you still have the logs showing from which distribution channgel this file was fetched on your system? That would help to figure out what's happening, if we could track down where it is happening. > > So far the author said your distfile 'looks like his code with some additional debug files included, that should not be there'. > This is the distinfo file that is *currently* listed in the port: http://www.freshports.org/devel/py-demjson http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/py-demjson/distinfo?revision=353206&view=co it was introduced by you: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/189442 It was the standard "make fetch" command that retrieved it. I may or may not have a log, I don't think it will be interesting. It came from the MASTER_SITES. It clearly was distributed by upstream. Somebody's left hand isn't talking to their right hand. John