From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 01:34:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB7A106564A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828DF8FC0A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so3801390wgb.31 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:34:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W+ywC4sikLknQTMy4RVZ4EmVH2CFiwQa+1AjwZHhvn4=; b=gidXCXSutODHTXey9hWQr627Y4JLYhFCNIixwBL1F4eH8mpcRbDcXdDWTgA5N0/2OT 8XbzwHDT2OIc/7we3SrIf2TF3Ltrt6ArTUWzakijtj/wPKG9aomEfEiiHKEhqS0T/zM/ DBl+lcwXZ8Q9aLQiMjHys5JxlhgAo9Op0NE7cufQgn9XoJPHzB3OabMW70A3I61ofjMQ hvtUOI5jwGWdoSzrSNiVxMhpaun8IOP21nOwEHTuiqsnDS6Cp/PJ5A1pi9eMALoP2NOZ s+m2lVLTbXuvZ+pQScW0KbWdnxT5ryBIQJMHyLpwzq5YrpBcyduHKL2x6TpaGFsYo0ZJ oFkw== Received: by 10.180.95.37 with SMTP id dh5mr12320842wib.8.1333935242466; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm26432429wib.2.2012.04.08.18.34.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 02:33:59 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120409023359.57387483@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20120408224447.692a9e2a@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FreeBSD's backwards webdesign / corporate identity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:34:04 -0000 On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:25:54 +0200 Mikkel Bang wrote: > Den 23:44 8. april 2012 skrev RW > f=F8lgende: >=20 > > > > The FreeBSD site isn't great, but this site is worse. > > > > Has no-one ever pointed-out the irony that the top 20% of the page > > bangs-on about simplifying, and has a "fight bloat on your website" > > link, but the other 80% is a cluttered mess. > > > > It also has a pet hate of mine: menus that make the rest of the page > > move around even when the pointer is just passing-over them. I can > > forgive the FreeBSD site all its faults for not doing that. > > >=20 > I understand you're trying to stand up for FreeBSD,=20 You understand wrongly. I don't really care about the FreeBSD site. I genuinely think that Siegel+Gale have a substandard website. Take a look at the Royal Academy and Design Council sites he linked - it's not in the same league. > but what you're > saying makes little sense. Siegel+Gale is one of the world's most > respected design agencies. And like, who are you?=20 So what are you saying? - I'm automatically wrong (irrespective of the facts) because they're respected design agency and I'm a nobody - You didn't understand what I wrote.=20 - you disagree with a specific point that you're not bothering to mention >Haters gonna hate. I'm not a hater. I'm at most a mocker. In particular I find it amusing that their own website fails to follow the vision that they advocate for other peoples.