From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep 12 21:17:31 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA05627
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:17:31 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA05609
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:17:27 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA12156
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for hackers@freebsd.org); Tue, 12 Sep 1995 23:14:00 -0500
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA00403; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:11:31 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 21:11:31 -0500
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199509130211.VAA00403@bonkers.taronga.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 1.1.5.1 disklabel under 2.x?
Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.hackers
In-Reply-To: <199509121241.OAA00208@gil>
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <199509121241.OAA00208@gil> you write:
>Only a short answer: 
>is it is or is it ain't possible to read a 1.1.5.1 disklabel
>(i.e. mount a 1.1.5.1 disk) under 2.x?

Yes.

>It looks to me it ain't.
>I'm getting 'bad Superblock'.

I had no problem, but I didn't fdisk and used real geometry.