Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Sep 2003 01:30:10 -0500
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
To:        Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports and -current
Message-ID:  <oprvscckuv8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>
References:  <3F6BF02F.9040707@schmalzbauer.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:14:07 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer 
<h@schmalzbauer.de> wrote:

> Well, for weeks now I couldn't compile (almost) any port. It seems that 
> ports aren't tested against -current. Is that true?
> Not only the -pthread removement broke countless ports (some of them are 
> easy to fix others aren't) also the entire new kde fails.
> Is there no aim to have ports running on -current?

Check in the bottom at 
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2003-September/002846.html 
.. I believe, we should be expect to see the many fixes for -CURRENT when 
the ports freeze lift.

Cheers,
Mezz

> I'm asking because my "workstation" has enough resources to track 
> -current to help testing. But if I breake ports with -current I won't 
> keep tracking it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Harry


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oprvscckuv8ckrg5>