Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:51:43 +0900 From: Joel Rees <joel@alpsgiken.gr.jp> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba between Mac and BSD Message-ID: <20030710104712.C4A3.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030708224159.A10335@barryg.mi.celestial.com> References: <000001c345d0$227e4300$1d02a8c0@kids> <20030708224159.A10335@barryg.mi.celestial.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:11:11PM -0700, esayer1@san.rr.com wrote: > > FreeBSD Question Answerer- > > First of all thank you for your help and time. I have a question about > >running a Samba server where the server is a FreeBSD machine and the client > >is a Macintosh ibook running max os X. ... And bill@Celestial.COM commented, > I would think that NFS would be a better choice between two Unix > systems than Samba. To which I might add that netatalk would seem to me to be a better option than Samba if the only client is a Mac. But then I've never done netatalk on freeBSD. -- Joel Rees, programmer, Kansai Systems Group Altech Corporation (Alpsgiken), Osaka, Japan http://www.alpsgiken.co.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030710104712.C4A3.JOEL>