From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  9 18:09:39 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2D337B404
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2003 18:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DEE343F3F
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2003 18:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 30611 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Apr 2003 01:09:38 -0000
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20030410000115.GC1280@garage.freebsd.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304091808030.30603-100000@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1
	killall.csrc/usr.sbinjexec.8
	jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 01:09:39 -0000

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:35:05PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> +> And what kind of path seperator is '.'?
> 
> Another solution:
> 
> 	struct prison {
> 		[...]
> 		char	**pr_name;
> 		size_t	  pr_namesize;
> 		[...]
> 	}

Ack, no.  There is no need to go implementing your own dynamic array
class.

> Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

No need to keep proving it!  :)

-Nate