Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:49:28 -0700
From:      Chip <chip@wiegand.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Gustaf Tham <gus@algonet.se>, FreeBSD-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: How can KDE 2.0 be so slow?
Message-ID:  <3B5ECE67.69F98918@wiegand.org>
References:  <20010725121303.C3D4.GUS@algonet.se> <20010725040152.A48725@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:43:05PM +0200, Gustaf Tham wrote:
>
> > Is it really possible that the new versions of KDE decrease performance this much?
>
> Anything's possible :-)
>
> I definitely noticed the slowdown myself when I briefly tried KDE2: I
> used to use an old version of KDE 1 on my pentium 120 a few years ago,
> and it was slowish, but usable; KDE2 is too slow to be usable on my
> PPro 233.  I just happily use Windowmaker.
>
> Kris
>

I tried KDE2 on my FreeBSD box, a K6-2/350 with 64megs ram. It is so slow
I don't even bother with it anymore. I use XFCE, which allows me to use
KDE apps, though I use only one - KWrite, withoutrunning KDE2.

--
Chip

>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

--
Regards,

--
Chip Wiegand
CRW Computer Services
www.wiegand.org
chip@wiegand.org
<------------------>
  Web page design
    Consulting
     PC Repair
<------------------>




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B5ECE67.69F98918>