From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 21 10:19:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8B41065679; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (mail.kirov.so-ups.ru [178.74.170.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF48C8FC1B; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kas30pipe.localhost (localhost.kirov.so-ups.ru [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id 79137B8026; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:23 +0400 (MSK) Received: from kirov.so-ups.ru (unknown [172.21.81.1]) by mail.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738C8B801F; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:23 +0400 (MSK) Received: by ns.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix, from userid 1010) id 57B3BB9FF8; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:23 +0400 (MSK) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (elsukov.kirov.oduur.so [10.118.3.52]) by ns.kirov.so-ups.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA77B9FEB; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:23 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <4F69AB2B.5050205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:19:23 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harald Schmalzbauer References: <4F69A3C1.7040305@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <4F69A3C1.7040305@omnilan.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0284], KAS30/Release X-SpamTest-Info: Not protected Cc: FreeBSD current , fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea for GEOM and policy based file encryption X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:19:31 -0000 On 21.03.2012 13:47, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Was such a policy based file encryption control doable with GEOM? > Maybe it's easier to make use of existing tools like gpg with GEOM > interaction? > I don't want to reinvent any file encryption, I just need some automatic > encryption (without _mandatory_ interaction) with lowest possible bypass > possibilities. It sounds like not a task for GEOM. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov