Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:47:12 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available Message-ID: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>; from gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:38:20PM -0800 References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote: > bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport > bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)? > > What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail? It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make world in case there's a system change. It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into /usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010129164711.K26076>