From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 6 09:15:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003DB1065672; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E048FC15; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so799344wfg.7 for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:15:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:message-id:to:cc :subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5wzLb/E3IzExudPenmjrJhd0QrHBDS6gCQr3ebEX82c=; b=AwGSsnPpJkbrywAX+oWGYZ1j3aCWavz+3fv97ZS7M5W8uo/F2UEZm2ToQO4BsuIwaF ZMxhZHiLzg9/vvqLZBb2VcV2ae99BPoSEYOT0FXGFIgqrn1kUE3PSIMASn66gR0x9eCS wMN2M4n9ExcWzrwZuC4wuMs9YbcEQCxMfKw8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=b5RYy8K4sQCd41rhpOby30Ac2u/3fRl+UUuFwiLZYlFQu82DyapWYx+Iv0Z4QTyAhc yznGCZnL2wV5RhNY/gIqlSmLsyARfwBgjqCc2A+am5BS0MnZU1AJj9ZPkorrvt2/mKw+ 5bQpijJlrlDfbTEj9Wsf5jyF51ELpRdI+MId4= Received: by 10.142.57.19 with SMTP id f19mr1595254wfa.80.1244279716876; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm2844245wfc.16.2009.06.06.02.15.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:13:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090606.181302.112520754.chat95@mac.com> To: scottl@samsco.org From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <4A2A1048.5090101@samsco.org> References: <20090527134343.GB1104@bsdcrew.de> <20090606.120001.68053946.chat95@mac.com> <4A2A1048.5090101@samsco.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sat_Jun__6_18_13_02_2009_790)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmark X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:15:18 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jun__6_18_13_02_2009_790)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Scott Long Subject: Re: Benchmark [Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4] Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:44:24 -0600 > Maho NAKATA wrote: >> I did a benchmark with Virtualbox: >> My environment: >> * Core 2 Quad, Q6600@3GHz >> * Windows XP SP3@host SP2@VBOX with GuestAddon >> * http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalMark/ >> CrystalMark 2004R3 >> * Sapphire X1650 >> * VBOX is running on FBSD7.2-REL/amd64 >> using http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_5.tgz >> * Running with fullscreen mode 1280x1024 32bit >> Here is the result >> ----------------------------------------- >> host(4CPU) host(1CPU) vbox(1CPU) >> Mark 173047 90925 86496 >> ALU 50985 13493 13060 >> FPU 63746 15126 15323 >> MEM 21822 25582 16516 >> HDD 9336 9331 30600(*) >> GDI 15153 15195 5127 >> D2D 5997 5998 5108 >> OGL 6200 6200 762 >> ----------------------------------------- >> (*)somehow lot faster >> I don't know how to use two CPUs, even changing setting >> doesn't change. >> Usually I cannot usually launch VirtualBox even by root. >> A workaround is that invoking and killing VirtualBox >> many times for me. After some tries I can launch... >> thanks >> > > I take it that you're running freebsd on the "bare metal" in your 4CPU > and 1CPU tests, and running WinXP on the bare metal in the vbox test? yes. > If so, are you using ATA disks and the ATA driver for all instances I use SATA for host machine and ATA as VirtualBox machine. > of FreeBSD? If so, then the lack of NCQ in the FreeBSD ATA driver > would > explain the HDD test result. I see similar results with VMWare. Ok, I see Thanks for your clarification. Best, -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/ Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jun__6_18_13_02_2009_790)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkoqMx8ACgkQpcQqaPiEzfkrOgCgoX2M0uFQT2mEjlEXripJL0ag EZYAn2nm+TJ6g6DOYfuvZ5OdfW+4BVm/ =Qw5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jun__6_18_13_02_2009_790)----