Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:05:59 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues Message-ID: <20081210180559.GC58682@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <A8284393-C4E8-4E7D-9ADF-F8270C354E13@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <20081209185236.GA1320@alf.bsdes.net> <493F84A4.1080308@yandex.ru> <20081210091107.GC1320@alf.bsdes.net> <A8284393-C4E8-4E7D-9ADF-F8270C354E13@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--L9fXoLhVbEF7eqMD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Dec-10 10:55:35 +0100, S=F8ren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.org> wrote: >And you will not use 64bit DMA even if the chipset supports it. =20 >However I have not seen any chipsets supporting this fail, YMMV as =20 >usual :) There's a reference in wikipedia pointing to http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg06694.html that claims the AMD/ATI SB600 lies about supporting 64-bit DMA in AHCI mode. I have a SB600 but it doesn't have >4GB to test on. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --L9fXoLhVbEF7eqMD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklABQcACgkQ/opHv/APuIe93QCfVomKQ7lkv9N/vjy3nkE5nSW5 Ot0An295JWo0uNF+4T48Dn41o5rfUFSR =+Jwp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L9fXoLhVbEF7eqMD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081210180559.GC58682>