From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Aug 23 10:45:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C1BC0E54 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FJ2V40xvz4cC7 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 896C9C0E51; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8930EC0E4F for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FJ2V33QYz4cC5 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C13A1B70C for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7NAjMuu004491 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x7NAjMXP004490 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231300] sysutils/py-salt fails to start with only tcp transport selected Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords flagtypes.name assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231300 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa Flags|maintainer-feedback?(python |maintainer-feedback?(christ |@FreeBSD.org) |er.edwards@gmail.com), | |merge-quarterly? Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Correct assignee and maintainer-feedback flags (python is not maintainer, but remains CC'd) If pyzmq isn't declared as an extras_require (but instead as an install_requires), then it is an unconditional dependency by way of its (potentially incorrect) declaration, and *_DEPENDS must match to suit, or t= he requirements in sources patched appropriately @Alexander, can you please confirm the exact set/values of port OPTIONS that produces this error. My interpretation is that this is reproducible *only* = if TCP=3DON (non default) and ZMQ=3DOFF (also non default) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=