Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:38:05 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        des@ofug.org
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not?
Message-ID:  <20020623123805.B51272@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020622.225127.112566091.imp@village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 10:51:27PM -0600
References:  <20020622200545.GS76002@squall.waterspout.com> <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020622.225127.112566091.imp@village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 10:51:27PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : Only users who haven't yet entered the 90s and discovered xdm.
>
> I think this attitude is not helpful.

Agreed.  I have never, ever used xdm and even disable dtlogin on Solaris.
I have always started X manually and intend to always do that.  On a
development system it is just a PITA to not be in this level of control.

Mechanism, not policy.

> I can't recall receiving a bug report from you.
                             ^^^
                             ^Wpatch

that would add back the granular menu of what X bits one wants to
install.  Or any other sysinstall patch that asks the user if they would
like the Xwrapper installed.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020623123805.B51272>