From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 28 19:51:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA12096 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:51:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA12091 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:51:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28843; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdN28841; Fri Jan 29 03:41:32 1999 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:41:29 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Bruce Evans cc: chris@netmonger.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd) In-Reply-To: <199901290326.OAA22743@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Bruce Evans wrote: > style(9) is supposed to document KNF. It is not supposed to document > best coding practices, julian's preferences or bde's preferences. KNF is not a static thing that cannot be changed. KNF is in effect whatever is written in style(9). In case I hadn't made myself clear, I'm suggesting that we effectively revise some aspects of FreeBSD's KNF. The resounding responce SO FAR (except for you) has been either "I don't really care about those changes" or "YES please!" julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message