Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:52:24 +0200
From:      Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
To:        Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net>
Cc:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk>
Subject:   Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance?
Message-ID:  <p06002085bd009afafa68@[10.0.1.3]>
In-Reply-To: <40DAE792.1090701@anduin.net>
References:   <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8M jT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com><40DADE69.3 0702@Deep	Core.dk> <40DAE792.1090701@anduin.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
At 4:39 PM +0200 2004-06-24, Eirik Oeverby wrote:

>  Any chance Silicon Image SATA-RAID chipsets will be supported this way?
>  Some of the heftier Tyan (dual) Opteron boards use this chipset.. I hear
>  from various sources that it sucks, but ...

	Check the archives for previous comments from Søren on this chipset.

>                                              Can't give up hope yet, can
>  I? ;)

	Yes, you might.  See the archives.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

   SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002085bd009afafa68>