Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:01:29 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.lib.mk Message-ID: <20030904140129.GA61909@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030904092755.GD45051@sunbay.com> References: <200309040429.h844TBhD058678@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030904083617.GA56261@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030904092755.GD45051@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 12:27:55PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > compatability link. It is actually the primary link. There should be no > > > symlinks in /lib at all. Only /lib/libXX.so.Y. > > > > Sorry about that, I shouldn't have just take it for granted that these > symlinks are no longer needed. Thanks, Peter, for backing it out. > > > GCC should have additional changes then. It is going to confuse other > > things to have the symlink in one directory and the real libs in another. > > > I will look into what else is needed in our toolchain to get rid of these > symlinks, and get back to you, David. Keep which ever symlinks you want /lib or /usr/lib -- but we should be totally unambigious as to which are the "real" ones, and don't install the other. Installing two sets of symlinks isn't the way to go. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030904140129.GA61909>