Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:03:07 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Rainer Alves <rainer.alves@gmail.com>, gnome@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ports freeze for 6.2 starts October 10 Message-ID: <20060919040307.GA19039@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1158562609.26454.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20060917093615.GJ80138@droso.net> <450DDE34.1080900@gmail.com> <20060918045201.GA72817@xor.obsecurity.org> <op.tf16z41v9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20060918054452.GA73811@xor.obsecurity.org> <1158562609.26454.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:56:49AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 01:44 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:32:18AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:01 -0500, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.or= g> =20 > > > wrote: > > >=20 > > > >On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:45:56PM -0300, Rainer Alves wrote: > > > >>Erwin Lansing wrote: > > > >>>In preparation for the 6.2 release, the ports tree will be frozen = from > > > >>>October 10. > > > >>>[...] > > > >> > > > >>Just wondering if there's a chance of seeing Gnome 2.16 committed b= efore > > > >>the freeze (I'm asking this since apparently it's already in the > > > >>marcuscom repo). Not that I care much about Gnome (I'm using xfce a= fter > > > >>all), but I'm interested in the new GTK and Evolution versions. > > > > > > > >I'd be interested to know about the GNOME team's plans for this, > > > >myself. > > >=20 > > > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/newsflash.html#event2006September17:0 > >=20 > > Thanks. >=20 > I based this off of the SDL conversation. The GNOME 2.16 merge will be > _much_ more involved since the PREFIX move will touch a lot of ports. > We were thinking of a full pointyhat regression. I'm all for a > pre-freeze commit if you think it's doable, but know that I will be > traveling in the UK for two weeks starting on the 23rd, so at least I > will be spotty when it comes to helping out with breakage. The SDL commit will likely be able to proceed, actually - the schedule announced by re@ gives us more time before the freeze than I'd first thought, and I'm testing the SDL patch set now. GNOME is obviously a much bigger enterprise though. The fact that you're travelling would be a concern for merging before the release, but perhaps you feel comfortable that others would be able to take care of problems in your absence? We may be able to test the patchset on pointyhat later in the week, depending on how the next exp build goes. That's probably about the time you're leaving though. Kris --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFD2v7Wry0BWjoQKURAs8XAJ0QRStNRgtGLLTujM6lKC20pD+9JACgq1nz JTh0gWkqdg3NfSwifqHrVG8= =PDGJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060919040307.GA19039>