From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 17 23:12:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80416A5A6 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) Received: from ketralnis.com (melchoir.ketralnis.com [68.183.67.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FAE13C448 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) Received: from [10.0.1.239] ([10.0.1.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by ketralnis.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0HMfeap025386; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:41:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dking@ketralnis.com) In-Reply-To: <45AE63EC.9020707@red56.co.uk> References: <45AE63EC.9020707@red56.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David King Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:41:38 -0800 To: java@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: Tim Diggins Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-ant-1.6.5_2 - is anyone working on port for 1.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:12:09 -0000 > quick question: is anyone working on port for apache ant 1.7? I've taken a look and we don't patch apache-ant at all, so in theory it should be as easy as modifying the Makefile and distinfo (and maybe the pkg-plist) Unless someone already has this patch in the works, I'll try do a send-pr some time tonight to wait for a friendly-neighbourhood-ports- committer to pick up > longer version: > I just noticed that apache ant 1.7 is out (as of december, see > release notes - http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.apache.org/ > ant/README.html) with some really useful bugfixes and mini-features > (like the resolution of the problem with optional task, library > requirements (where to put your jars) and various out-of-memory > errors fixed). Is anyone who knows what they're doing (i.e. unlike > me) likely to work on / commit a portfile relatively soon?