From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Feb 27 09:44:46 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582F1F353DC; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23556C4A4; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w1R9iiQr034424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:44:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r463107 - in head: astro/accrete devel/mph devel/p5-IPC-MMA devel/p5-Parse-PlainConfig devel/p5-Sub-Alias devel/p5-Sys-Cpu devel/p5-Sys-MemInfo graphics/delaboratory net/yaph sysutils/c... To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201802270455.w1R4tqAS020032@repo.freebsd.org> <20180227092450.cru4nfvh4j2aleuv@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Yuri Message-ID: <9486f6fe-ecce-8d00-9c24-f93e45dad12d@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 01:44:43 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180227092450.cru4nfvh4j2aleuv@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:44:46 -0000 On 02/27/18 01:24, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > You do know that if there is no MX record but there is a A record, it > will be used, right ? Have you checked that this is also not the case? I checked those too, just didn't include this in the message because A and AAAA records are for historical purposes, and very few systems still use them. >> Approved by: tcberner (mentor, implicit) > PS: I doubt very much that this is included in the "simple" updates you > have been granted implicit approval for. This looked pretty simple, just one field is affected. Yuri