From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 19 6:25: 2 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A17437B417; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:24:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0JEOnD09935; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:24:50 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:24:49 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Robert Watson Cc: Kris Kennaway , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_opie pam_opie.c Message-ID: <20020119142448.GA9803@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20020119140308.GA9574@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 09:14:20 -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > No one debates the technical points here. It seems, some people still tries to discuss them while the case is technically obvious. > They're asking you to get some > basic advanced review for modifications to the critical system > authentication code before you commit the changes. In many cases, the I agree. As I already write, I honestly search for MAINTAINER line and not found it. Then I remember that I try to report wrong pam_opie chaining problem to PAM people (without a solution since I don't know it those times) several times with no success and no discussion. Then I treat all of this like "go and fix by yourself, we are not interested in". -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message