From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 12:46:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDFB1065670 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi6.fit.vutbr.cz [IPv6:2001:67c:1220:808::93e5:80c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E118FC14 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0NCkewU015134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.14.5/8.13.1/Submit) id q0NCkedM015133 for freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:46:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:46:40 +0100 From: Cejka Rudolf To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120123124640.GA14281@fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 147.229.8.12 Subject: Upgrade of ftp-master.eu.FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:46:42 -0000 Hello, I have done upgrade of motherboard in ftp-master.eu.FreeBSD.org (also as update3.FreeBSD.org) from very old to not so very old one. Finally, I can switch to 64bit mode in the future. There is currently 3.2 TB disk space, 2 x Intel Xeon E5335 2.0 GHz (2 x 4 cores), 4 GB RAM and 10 GbE connectivity (it is almost impossible to go over 1 GbE, but it is nice to have 10 GbE ;o). And some tuning to try to increase download speeds, but I'm not sure about their effects. If you want, you can try to experiment with sendbuf/recvbuf too - server side is already increased: vfs.hirunningspace=8388608 # 1048576 vfs.read_max=64 # 8 net.inet.tcp.tso=0 # 1 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0 # 1 kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608 # 262144 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=524288 # 32768 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=524288 # 65536 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=8388608 # 262144 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=8388608 # 262144 net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=131072 # 8192 net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=131072 # 16384 hw.intr_storm_threshold=100000 # 1000 kern.maxvnodes=200000 # 100000 vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem=51200000 # 2097152 Best regards. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic