Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 8807) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409291056060.32071-100000@netcore.fi> In-Reply-To: <y7v8yavsbhu.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] 神明達哉 wrote: > Okay. Now I think I figure out the problem. Those host routes were > created not deliberately, so the kernel will eventually need a fix to > this. > > But if you are in a hurry and/or cannot replace the kernel soon, I > think setting net.inet6.ip6.rtexpire to 0 can be a workaround (with > this you even do not have to reboot the kernel - though rebooting may > also help if you can). Warning: this freezed the system immediately [all network connectivity broke, and I had to do a quick reset]. Maybe I should have set it up at reboot before the system was in a 'bad' shape.. Speaking of 6to4, if_stf.c does not support setting the MTU, because there's no ioctl handler for it. It wouldn't IMHO hurt to be able to raise it from the glued-in default of 1280.. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0409291056060.32071-100000>