Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:25:09 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: Steve Thompson <steve.f.thompson@gmail.com>, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Doc issue for 9.0 release notes? Message-ID: <CAGH67wSYCnoo5Wnr=chkX66N47y1AXwb8WFM5F%2BxMhEXGsH84w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6A2AD2.2040702@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAKPZRnVrnydy65H21GqF=-C5eimVeCpTNga0%2Bm31ooXhssQaTg@mail.gmail.com> <4E6A2AD2.2040702@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On 9/9/11 10:25 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> According to section 2.2.5 ZFS has just been upgraded to version 14. =A0= See: >> http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/article.html#DISKS >> >> However, according to wikipedia's ZFS entry FreeBSD 9.0 is supposed to >> include version 28. =A0See >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#Version_numbers<http://en.wikipedia.org= /wiki/ZFS> >> . >> >> Which one is correct? >> > > ZFS version 28 is the correct version. =A0Once the doc tree is tagged > (scheduled for today), this can be fixed. =A0Thanks for pointing this out= . > >> P.S. I'm really interested in knowing when FreeBSD will have version 30 = that >> includes encryption. >> > > Last I was aware, version 30 is closed-source and owned by Oracle. > Unless they release the source as Sun was doing, I doubt we will have > ZFS version 30. =A0(I would be happy to be told this is not true, though = - > I'd love to have ZFS encryption as well.) I suggest asking about ZFS 30 on the filesystem list. A little birdy at BAFUG last night said that opensource groups are not sitting on its laurels while Oracle marches on :).. Thanks, -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wSYCnoo5Wnr=chkX66N47y1AXwb8WFM5F%2BxMhEXGsH84w>