Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:00:42 +0000
From:      Nali Toja <nalitoja@gmail.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Patch for ports on 10-current
Message-ID:  <86ipnw4id1.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:59:08 -0700")
References:  <4E935C9C.2090502@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:

> Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
> that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
> that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
> tools to work with:
>
> http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
[...]
> +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000000 && !defined(NO_LIBTOOL_FIXED)

The issue does not lie in OSVERSION but in OSREL. So, why not be smarter
and detect if a user has UNAME_r workaround in environment by

  .if ${OSREL:R} >= 10 && !defined(NO_FOO_FIX)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ipnw4id1.fsf>