From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 10:31:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8450B16A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:31:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fuego.fadesa.es (fuego.fadesa.es [195.55.55.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6342543D2D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd4@fadesa.es) Received: (from root@localhost) by fuego.fadesa.es (8.9.3p2/8.8.8) id LAA23238 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:33:00 +0100 Received: from tierra.fadesa.es(195.55.55.7) by fuego.fadesa.es Mon, 7 Feb 05 11:32:44 +0100 Received: from fadesa.es (filemon.fadesa.es [195.55.55.6] (may be forged)) by tierra.fadesa.es (8.9.3p2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18877 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:30:43 +0100 Sender: fan@fadesa.es Message-ID: <42074353.9E3EECBE@fadesa.es> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 11:30:43 +0100 From: "=?iso-8859-15?Q?Jos=E9?= M. =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fandi=F1o?=" Organization: Inmobiliaria FADESA X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.27-ow1 i686) X-Accept-Language: gl, en, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <42073FD8.5CCA7EC5@fadesa.es> <20050207102140.GA56842@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Logged: Logged by tierra.fadesa.es as LAA18877 at Mon Feb 7 11:30:43 2005 Subject: Re: 50% of packets lost only on local interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:31:14 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: > > "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote: > > > > > > Chris wrote: > > > > > > > > Have tested on 3 boxes. > > > > > > yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't > > > believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible. > > > > Finally, I found the culprit: > > > > CFLAGS="" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received > > COPTFLAGS="" / > > > > CFLAGS= -pipe \ 50% of the transmited traffic is received > > COPTFLAGS= -pipe / > > That would be exceedingly strange, because the above two options are > supposed to produce *no differences at all* with the code generation. > > I'd believe that -O and no -O could behave differently, although I > don't know why you'd want to compile without -O. because by the time I was compiling the system I was no interested in compiler optimizations. Now I prefer a lightly optimized kernel than a system with 50% of packet lost in local interfaces ;-) -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/IT d- s+:+() a- C+++ UBL+++$ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N+ o++ K- w--- O+ M+ V- PS+ PE+ Y++ PGP+>+++ t+ 5 X+$ R- tv-- b+++ DI D++>+++ G++ e- h+(++) !r !z ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------