From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 27 16:01:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F23716A4DF for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4445E43D9B for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:01:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A61C5CE0; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:01:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9YZARFpx+v7; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:01:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.251] (pool-68-161-117-245.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.117.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E1E5C27; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:01:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44C8E336.1070900@mac.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:00:54 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steel City Phantom References: <44C8E013.4070906@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <44C8E013.4070906@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: very strange sockets problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:01:48 -0000 Steel City Phantom wrote: [ ... ] > i have eliminated all hardware in between the two systems. i dumped the > traffic with tcpdump and the machine does actually receive the data. me > and my team of developers are stumped, jboss support is stumped, i was > wondering if any of you guys could think of something. Lack of data. Post a verbose tcpdump trace, anonymizing the IPs if you feel you must...and double-check your firewall logs, especially if NAT is involved anywhere in the network topology. -- -Chuck