From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 11:38:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F95E113; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4294C2E85; Tue, 27 May 2014 11:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52643B4A; Tue, 27 May 2014 06:38:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5384790D.602@marino.st> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:37:49 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogUnV0a293c2tp?= , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/189666: devel/py-demjson: unfetchable due to rerolled tarball References: <201405260846.s4Q8kUdC079970@freefall.freebsd.org> <53839C13.4040405@marino.st> <5383A1B3.9070501@marino.st> <320E544D-4247-48D0-B3A6-E2471B36ED7D@robakdesign.com> <03A1FF33-BC5E-40B4-9742-575C9B38D439@robakdesign.com> <5383A6CA.9090004@marino.st> <2AA2639A-AF81-44E3-9686-23615C27696C@robakdesign.com> In-Reply-To: <2AA2639A-AF81-44E3-9686-23615C27696C@robakdesign.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@robakdesign.com, freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:38:30 -0000 On 5/27/2014 00:03, Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: > > I've asked him for confirmation if what's up there now > (24f638daa0c28a9d44db2282d46ea3edfd4c7d11a656e38677b741620bf1483d) is > what he wants it to be, and it if is, then we'll get distfiles fixed, > hopefully, for the last time, as I've also asked him for caution when > releasing the code and at least minor version bumps, when he wants to > push anything new. He's been very cooperative so far. Okay, sounds great. Version 2.0.1 would be ideal, but if he confirms the hash of the 115k distfile we can accept that. John