Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:17:50 +0300 (MSK) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@ints.ru> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903122015550.91667-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru> In-Reply-To: <199903120628.WAA73182@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :> Here's an idea.. FreeBSD could pay for a 3rd party security audit > :> of a stock FreeBSD system. Peter Shipley did this for Whistle > :> and the InterJet (a "black box" approach). No problems were found > :> but it was good to know that :-) > :This is a joke, right? > It would be hillarious if we could get a C2 certification for a base > GENERIC system. With posix.1e fully implemented it should get B2 ;-) but who will pay for sertification??? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903122015550.91667-100000>