Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:20:39 +0100 From: Jimmy Renner <jimbo@renner.se> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mumble in pkg Message-ID: <20170123172039.Horde.EefRiuOUnzwhO8o7tlgwK45@renner.se> In-Reply-To: <e5c97e9f-8f12-b7a9-1491-8e937f59b8df@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170123162659.Horde.CAdI8qu8YGA-DxGS1MXC6Wj@renner.se> <e5c97e9f-8f12-b7a9-1491-8e937f59b8df@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Citerar Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>: > On 2017/01/23 15:26, Jimmy Renner wrote: >> I might be totally off (and in the wrong forum) but I'm having problems >> running the mumble version fetched by pkg, if I try to build the same >> version in ports everything works fine. The failing one complains about >> "unable to allocate SSL_CTX". The big difference I see is that the pkg >> version is using /usr/lib/lbssl.so.8 and /lib/libcrypto.so.8 and the >> ports version is using /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.9 and >> /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.9. The odd thing is that both binaries are >> reporting to be version OpenSSL 1.0.2j though the one depending on the >> libs in /usr/lib says OpenSSL 1.0.2j-freebsd. > > What are the options settings for the instance of OpenSSL you built from > ports? What version of SSL/TLS are you trying to use? > > Cheers, > > Matthew I'm using the default options, however if I build the port and then run "pkg upgrade" it wants to re-install mumble because "needed shared library changed". I haven't specified any SSL version anywhere, should I have? The port variant is the one working though. I would have understood if the port variant didn't work but I can't do much about the dependencies for the pre-built one from pkg, or can I? Cheers, Jimmy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170123172039.Horde.EefRiuOUnzwhO8o7tlgwK45>