From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 06:21:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF6E106564A for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from angel.comcen.com.au (angel.comcen.com.au [203.23.236.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D4F8FC0C for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.192] (unknown [202.172.126.254]) by angel.comcen.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0E95C2F32B; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:22:31 +1100 (EST) From: Da Rock To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: References: <325E4EC8-BD2B-45C1-978C-4922D16D3A94@identry.com> <9391FD2D-59ED-455A-8C87-2854C7EF1E52@mac.com> <1234498626.13067.96.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <470E75B0-C7E9-4F05-A112-62DF01F1EA1D@mac.com> <1234500741.13067.111.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:27 +1000 Message-Id: <1234506087.13067.123.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Old user can't log in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:21:09 -0000 On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 21:52 -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Feb 12, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Da Rock wrote: > >> With reasonable organization, and appropriate use of sudo or setgid > >> binaries for things like people who use SVN or CVS, there generally > >> isn't reason or need for a user to be in so many groups. For the > >> exceptional cases, switching to using a full ACL system rather than > >> the traditional Unix permission model is probably going to be a > >> better > >> solution. > > > > Interesting. What would you suggest for full ACL? > > Well, it depends on what you're doing in terms of user requirements > and systems (ie, are the FreeBSD boxes fileservers, clients, or > both?), but the stuff which comes with FreeBSD is documented in > acl(3), getfacl, setfacl, etc. Other choices might involve something > like the Andrew File System / Transarc DFS stuff, or Windows Active > Directory and Samba/CIFS on the FreeBSD boxes.... > > Regards, So you're talking in terms of the FS only? I thought you said the kernel wasn't capable? I'll have to look into this a more thoroughly, I'm intrigued to say the least. Not to say I'll ever probably use it, but it does present a limitation.