From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 29 16:52:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EBF16A417 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3757D13C461 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l6TGpxZ4001558; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:51:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:51:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:51:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Rong-en Fan In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0707290944s2531e32cuf50c9f7c60509070@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20070729124116.GA4489@saltmine.radix.net> <20070729135024.GA473@saltmine.radix.net> <20070729144202.GA17101@saltmine.radix.net> <46ACA806.5030704@FreeBSD.org> <6eb82e0707290944s2531e32cuf50c9f7c60509070@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Thomas Dickey , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:52:00 -0000 On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote: > > Thomas has explained me in details about what his has. Judge from > Daniel's original post, I would like to know which libncurses.so that > xterm is using, and is devel/ncurses or devel/ncurses-devel installed? > > The ncurses update was in late Jan and enable widec support in Mar, IIRC. > Since then, only few non-functional Makefile changes to base's ncurses > part. BTW, base's less is updated in early Jun, not sure if it's related. FYI, setting PAGER="more -Xd" works around the problem, but I don't think that really proves anything. -- DE