Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:01:45 +1100 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
Cc:        Sebastian Mellmann <sebastian.mellmann@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re[2]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other
Message-ID:  <20090129014910.V86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru>
References:  <58305.62.206.221.107.1233071856.squirrel@anubis.getmyip.com> <20090128183250.O86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, KES wrote:

 > ????????????, Ian.
 > 
 > May be this will be usefull for you

Yes, but I need to read it more times :)  Nicely answers the question 
about stats per flow/queue anyway, not too hard to parse for logging.

 > #1. ping -D -S 10.10.16.16 -s 1472 -i 0.01 10.0.16.1
 > #2. ping -S 10.10.16.17 10.0.16.1

Results suggest that #1 was -S 10.10.16.19 ?  A script running the same 
number of #2 before killing #1 (or such) would make comparisons between 
different runs easier to follow maybe?

Thanks, lots of useful info; hoping to try some weighted queueing soon.

cheers, Ian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090129014910.V86094>