Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:01:45 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru> Cc: Sebastian Mellmann <sebastian.mellmann@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other Message-ID: <20090129014910.V86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru> References: <58305.62.206.221.107.1233071856.squirrel@anubis.getmyip.com> <20090128183250.O86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, KES wrote: > ????????????, Ian. > > May be this will be usefull for you Yes, but I need to read it more times :) Nicely answers the question about stats per flow/queue anyway, not too hard to parse for logging. > #1. ping -D -S 10.10.16.16 -s 1472 -i 0.01 10.0.16.1 > #2. ping -S 10.10.16.17 10.0.16.1 Results suggest that #1 was -S 10.10.16.19 ? A script running the same number of #2 before killing #1 (or such) would make comparisons between different runs easier to follow maybe? Thanks, lots of useful info; hoping to try some weighted queueing soon. cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090129014910.V86094>