Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:23:40 -0800
From:      R Joseph Wright <rjoseph@nwlink.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: What are the differences?
Message-ID:  <3890A94C.3A424949@nwlink.com>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001270958280.4470-100000@mail.telestream.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
keith@mail.telestream.com wrote:
> 
> Well, I've recently switched from being a strictly linux user to a
> strictly FreeBSD user for all of our operations here as well as my
> personal workstations. Here are the reasons why.
> 
> #1 Linux is becoming diluted. You can't install anything without grabing
> some obscure lib.
> 
> #2 Linux can't just do a makeworld after a cvsup and rebuild to the most
> recent version of essentialy everything important.
> 
> #3 Truth be told, linux is not half as stable as FreeBSD.

I don't know if that's a fact or not, but I noticed that while running
X, FreeBSD seems much more stable than linux.

> #4 I don't like the fact that Linux<redhat> is attempting to be the next
> MS. Now that RedHat has gone public, they have people to answer to and
> margins to aspire to just like MS. This causes things to be rushed to
> market to soon and a degredation of code. Or should I just say sloppier
> code.

I tend to agree, but we won't know until they've been at it for awhile.

> #5 FreeBSD may be slower in coming out with options and features but at
> least when they do they are essentialy sound and stable.
> 
> #6 You never realy notice how increadibly slow Linux is until you get into
> FreeBSD. I was astounded at the difference. Just in running Windowmaker
> between the two OS's on identical machines will show big differences.
> 
> #7 One word   "ports"   how freakin kewl an idea is that.. I love it. That
> alone is a reason to use FreeBSD. Makes RPM's look like old school slop.

I cannot agree here.  I've had too many Error Code 1's while building
ports, and even a few kernel panics.  I think the ports have a long way
to go.  FreeBSD could use a better packaging system for the installation
of binaries for those of us who don't want to compile every program we
put on our systems.  "pkg_add" is adequate, but not nearly as advanced
as rpm.


-- 
R Joseph Wright 

*I merely took the energy it takes to pout
and wrote some blues --Duke Ellington*


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3890A94C.3A424949>