Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 May 1999 22:06:32 -0400
From:      Leo Papandreou <leo@talcom.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ?
Message-ID:  <19990525220632.A22788@homer.talcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <000001bea677$bc99d5f0$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:28:00PM -0700
References:  <199905250611.XAA00594@dingo.cdrom.com> <000001bea677$bc99d5f0$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:28:00PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
> > Speaking from a developer's viewpoint; if a complaint from any quarter
> > doesn't contain the bare minimum of real information needed to identify
> > the problem (or at least problem class) it's worthless.  In fact, it's
> > worse than worthless, it's an active waste of my time even thinking
> > about it.
> 
> 	That I do disagree with. The complaint was precise -- the RELEASE was not
> stable.
> 

Then you'll agree with this: 3-R is/was stable as a rock on my hardware.
Why wasnt it released earlier?

> 	While it did not contain enough information to solve the problem, there are
> certainly possible solutions to it

That makes sense.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990525220632.A22788>